<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>stonetable.org &#187; writing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stonetable.org/category/writing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stonetable.org</link>
	<description>An economy of words</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 19:32:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Explore the Dollhouse</title>
		<link>http://www.stonetable.org/2009/12/08/explore-the-dollhouse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stonetable.org/2009/12/08/explore-the-dollhouse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 20:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dollhouse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stonetable.org/?p=634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even though my current favorite show, Dollhouse, has been officially canceled1, the folks over at Smart Pop are running a Dollhouse Essay Contest.
We love Dollhouse. And we know from Buffy and Firefly that Joss Whedon fans are across-the-board smart, insightful, and involved.
So we’ve teamed up with Jane Espenson, Dollhouse writer and Mutant Enemy veteran, to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though my current favorite show, <em>Dollhouse</em>, has been officially canceled<sup>1</sup>, the folks over at Smart Pop are running a <a href="http://www.smartpopbooks.com/contest"><em>Dollhouse</em> Essay Contest</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>We love <em>Dollhouse</em>. And we know from <em>Buffy</em> and <em>Firefly</em> that Joss Whedon fans are across-the-board smart, insightful, and involved.</p>
<p>So we’ve teamed up with Jane Espenson, <em>Dollhouse</em> writer and Mutant Enemy veteran, to put out an essay anthology on <em>Dollhouse</em> composed entirely of fan-written essays. Everyone, novice to seasoned writer, is eligible to enter; the only requirement is that you are fan of <em>Dollhouse</em>!</p>
<p>Write a great essay on <em>Dollhouse</em>, send it to us, and your essay could be published in a Smart Pop book edited by Jane.</p></blockquote>
<p>I usually shy away from non-fiction but I might give this a shot. I&#8217;m a huge fan of <em>Dollhouse</em> (and of Joss Whedon in general) and I have very strong feelings about what Joss and team are trying to do with the show.</p>
<hr /><sup>1</sup><span style="font-size: xx-small">There is a glimmer of hope that Fox will reconsider the decision to cancel the show, if the ratings for the last aired episodes makes a miraculous turnaround. One would hope they would learn their mistakes from Firefly and simply Trust In Joss.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stonetable.org/2009/12/08/explore-the-dollhouse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doing the Limbo &#8211; How low will you go?</title>
		<link>http://www.stonetable.org/2009/12/08/doing-the-limbo-how-low-will-you-go/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stonetable.org/2009/12/08/doing-the-limbo-how-low-will-you-go/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 06:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stonetable.org/?p=631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Inspired by John Scalzi&#8217;s &#8220;In the Spirit of Pulps, and Paying Even Less&#8220;, there has been a slew of discussion on the topic of pay rates for authors (and I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ve missed some). In short, John rails against markets paying minuscule per-word rates for fiction and defenders from both camps come out to add [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inspired by John Scalzi&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009/12/01/in-the-spirit-of-the-pulps-and-paying-even-less/">In the Spirit of Pulps, and Paying Even Less</a>&#8220;, there has been a <a href="http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009/12/02/black-matrix-publishing-responds/">slew</a> of <a href="http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009/12/03/aspiring-writer-stockholm-syndrome/">discussion</a> on the topic of <a href="http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009/12/04/my-short-fiction-rates/">pay rates</a> for authors (and I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ve missed some). In short, John rails against markets paying minuscule per-word rates for fiction and defenders from both camps come out to add their side to the debate. Two posts in particular stand out to me, as an aspiring writer.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s easy for new authors to fall into the trap of submitting to smaller, lower-paying markets first, thinking that their odds of getting published are higher. When your confidence is low, you are statistically more likely to get an ego-boosting acceptance from non-paying and token markets. Duotrope&#8217;s list of <a href="http://duotrope.com/RTstats.aspx?report=Top50&amp;pubtype=S">most approachable markets</a> backs that up: 52% are non-paying, 16% only pay occasionally, and 6% offer payments up to semi-pro rates (usually a flat rate per story). Two markets do pay professional rates but only accept twitter-length stories.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jeffvandermeer.com/2009/12/07/bad-credits-wont-help-publish/">Bad Credits Will Not Help You Get Published</a>, from <a href="http://rachel-swirsky.livejournal.com/">Rachel Swirsky</a> guest blogging on <a href="http://www.jeffvandermeer.com/">Jeff VanderMeer</a>&#8217;s blog, discusses why no credits are potentially better than credits from &#8220;bad&#8221; credits, from her experience as an editor and slush reader.</p>
<p>My friend <a href="http://inkhaven.net/">Christie</a> asked me what I thought about the debate a few days ago. I realized, upon reflection, that while logically I know to aim high, the temptation for easy approval is still there and that doesn&#8217;t fit with my goals.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tobiasbuckell.com">Tobias Buckell</a>&#8217;s post on <a href="http://www.tobiasbuckell.com/2009/12/07/writing-neepery-short-story-pay/">Writing neepery</a>, while not exactly a watershed moment for me, did give me something very valuable to ponder. Setting a minimum rate per word that I&#8217;ll accept. Writing is just as much a business as publishing and both should be treated with seriousness. There are always exceptions to the rule; markets like Electric Velocipede and Hadley Rille Books are favorites of mine and I&#8217;ll submit to them regardless of rate if I have something that fits.</p>
<p>At some point, you need to ask yourself what you&#8217;re trying to achieve as a writer. If you&#8217;re simply looking to see your work in &#8220;print&#8221;, electronic or otherwise, then it really doesn&#8217;t matter where you submit. If, like myself, you want to make a career out of this writing thing and eventually make a living at it, then you need to value your work appropriately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stonetable.org/2009/12/08/doing-the-limbo-how-low-will-you-go/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.512 seconds -->
